{"id":2277,"date":"2018-08-14T18:25:32","date_gmt":"2018-08-14T18:25:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/?p=2277"},"modified":"2018-08-14T18:25:32","modified_gmt":"2018-08-14T18:25:32","slug":"a-randomized-trial-of-pneumatic-reduction-versus-hydrostatic-reduction-for-intussusception-in-pediatric-patients-%d1%80%d1%96%d0%b7%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%86%d1%8f-%d0%bc%d1%96%d0%b6-%d0%b7%d0%b0%d1%81%d1%82","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/?p=2277","title":{"rendered":"A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients\/ \u0420\u0456\u0437\u043d\u0438\u0446\u044f \u043c\u0456\u0436 \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\u043c \u043f\u043d\u0435\u0432\u043c\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0456 \u0440\u0456\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043a\u0438\u0448\u0435\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u0456\u043d\u0432\u0430\u0433\u0456\u043d\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0457 \u0443 \u0434\u0456\u0442\u0435\u0439"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 class=\"articleTitle\">A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients<\/h1>\n<div class=\"author\">Xiaolong Xie, Yang Wu, Qi Wang, Yiyang Zhao, Guobin Chen, Bo Xiang<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>DOI:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005<\/a><\/div>\n<div>Journal of Pediatric Surgery<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/issue\/S0022-3468(18)X0007-4\"> August 2018\u00a0<\/a>Volume 53, Issue 8, Pages\u00a01464\u20131468<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"abstract\">\n<h2 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Abstract<\/h2>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Objectives<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>Data of randomly controlled trials comparing the hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients as initial therapy are lacking. The aim of this study was to conduct a randomly controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of the hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction techniques.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Study design<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>All intussusception patients who visited West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled in this study in which they underwent pneumatic reduction or hydrostatic reduction. Patients were randomized into ultrasound-guided hydrostatic or X-ray-guided pneumatic reduction group. The data collected includes demographic data, symptoms, signs, and investigations. The primary outcome of the study was the success rate of reduction. And the secondary outcomes of the study were the rates of intestinal perforations and recurrence.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Results<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>A total of 124 children with intussusception who had met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The overall success rate of this study was 90.32%. Univariable analysis showed that the success rate of hydrostatic reduction with normal saline (96.77%) was significantly higher than that of pneumatic reduction with air (83.87%) (<em>p<\/em>\u2005=\u20050.015). Perforation after reduction was found in only one of the pneumatic reduction group. The recurrence rate of intussusception in the hydrostatic reduction group was 4.84% compared with 3.23% of pneumatic reduction group.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Conclusion<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>Our study found that ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction is a simple, safe and effective nonoperative treatment for pediatric patients suffering from intussusceptions, and should be firstly adopted in the treatment of qualified patients.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Level of evidence<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>Therapeutic study<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<section>\n<h3 class=\"sectionTitle\" tabindex=\"0\">Type of study<\/h3>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>Prospective study<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"content\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"keywords\">\n<h4>Key words:<\/h4>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/action\/doSearch?searchType=quick&amp;occurrences=all&amp;ltrlSrch=true&amp;searchScope=series&amp;searchText=Randomized%20trial&amp;seriesISSN=0022-3468\">Randomized trial<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/action\/doSearch?searchType=quick&amp;occurrences=all&amp;ltrlSrch=true&amp;searchScope=series&amp;searchText=Intussusception&amp;seriesISSN=0022-3468\">Intussusception<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/action\/doSearch?searchType=quick&amp;occurrences=all&amp;ltrlSrch=true&amp;searchScope=series&amp;searchText=Pneumatic%20reduction&amp;seriesISSN=0022-3468\">Pneumatic reduction<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/action\/doSearch?searchType=quick&amp;occurrences=all&amp;ltrlSrch=true&amp;searchScope=series&amp;searchText=Hydrostatic%20reduction&amp;seriesISSN=0022-3468\">Hydrostatic reduction<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpedsurg.org\/action\/doSearch?searchType=quick&amp;occurrences=all&amp;ltrlSrch=true&amp;searchScope=series&amp;searchText=Pediatric&amp;seriesISSN=0022-3468\">Pediatric<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients Xiaolong Xie, Yang Wu, Qi Wang, Yiyang Zhao, Guobin Chen, Bo Xiang DOI:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005 Journal of Pediatric Surgery August 2018\u00a0Volume 53, Issue 8, Pages\u00a01464\u20131468 Abstract Objectives Data of randomly controlled trials comparing the hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9],"tags":[837,838],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2277"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2277"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2278,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2277\/revisions\/2278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drshevchuk.com.ua\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}